NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1866%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
