NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
GRID K2
+168%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
26.68 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
853.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
26.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
