NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
+341%
1.439 TFLOPS
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
68W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
