Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 and a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1124MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (68W vs 195W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680 +125%
3.25 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2012
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 600
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1046 MHz
Base Clock
1006 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
44.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1439 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
44.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

68W
TDP
195W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy