NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+362%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2100M
39
Quadro K5200
+651%
293
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
576
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GK110B
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
