Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1506MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla P6 +978%
6.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1012 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy