NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+480%
3.318 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
30
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+1443%
463
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+491%
71
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
