NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
+17%
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
