NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+303%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
