NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 8GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 8 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 8
+1264%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
