NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 62W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000D
+52%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
