NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+81%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF110
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
