Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +11%
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF110
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
247W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy