NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
+33%
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GM108
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
