NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
+172%
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G92
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
