NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
+253%
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK107
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
