Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +602%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy