NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
GRID A100B
+11874%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
108
48
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA100
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
