NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
+1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
40
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
