NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
+122%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
247W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
