NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+1185%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
96
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
TU117B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
