NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+1193%
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
9
96
Shading Units
1152
24
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GP106
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
