NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
7072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
A10M
+10091%
23.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
56
96
Shading Units
7168
24
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA102
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
