NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (62W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
+108%
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
4
96
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
62W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GF106
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
