NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K140Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
NVIDIA GRID K140Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 768GB)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
GRID K140Q
+41%
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
130W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK107
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
