NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
8096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+6313%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
8192
24
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
90 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
