Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
14320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +94453%
44.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
14336
8
TMUs
896
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
46.98 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N10M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
100 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net