NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+1083%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
108W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA107S
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
