NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
10736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+110500%
38.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
84
16
Shading Units
10752
8
TMUs
336
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
