NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+22720%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
26
16
Shading Units
3328
8
TMUs
104
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
12 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
