NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
14576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A
+350185%
122.6 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
14592
8
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
760W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
146 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
