NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+16050%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GK110B
NB9M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
