NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+10393%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
