NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
-
Shading Units
5888
24
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
