NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
-
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
Unknown
196 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
