NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (42W vs 45W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
-
Shading Units
32
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
