NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
-
Shading Units
10240
24
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
