NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
+5423%
5.468 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA107S
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
