NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
+2140%
2.218 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GM204
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
