NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
RTX A4 Mobile
+10720%
7.25 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1297 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.250 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
