NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
+3316%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
