NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+3137%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
122W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
