NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
+753%
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
