NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 42W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+4852%
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
