NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA L4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 72W)
NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
L4
+45108%
30.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
20.80GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
60
32
Shading Units
7424
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
8.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
66.56 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
72W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
