NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3141%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
320
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-512
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
