Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
4768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +2070%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

11
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
352
Shading Units
5120
44
TMUs
320
40
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
640 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GV100
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

152W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy