Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
19104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +22531%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
320bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

11
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
352
Shading Units
19456
44
TMUs
880
40
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
640 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
MI300
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
146 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

152W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy