Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +559%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
5120
112
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy