Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100 +19%
2.142 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy